Shotomatic vs Folge: Which Step Recorder Fits Your Workflow?
Compare Shotomatic and Folge for Mac click capture, local editing, annotations, document structure, exports, platforms, and workflow fit.

Shotomatic and Folge are both visual documentation tools, but they emphasize different output. Shotomatic focuses on a direct Mac capture, review, and export sequence. Folge combines local capture with a broader document editor and a larger set of formats.
Use this comparison to choose based on platform, editing depth, structure, and delivery rather than a single feature count.
TL;DR: Choose Shotomatic for a focused Mac workflow with short-guide support on Free and a simple ordered editor. Choose Folge for Mac and Windows authoring, deeper document structure, extensive annotations, and broader export customization.
Shotomatic vs Folge at a glance
| Factor | Shotomatic Action Capture | Folge |
|---|---|---|
| Desktop platforms | macOS | macOS and Windows |
| Capture target | Window, area, or supported capture target in the Mac workflow | Active window, full screen, or selected region |
| Capture trigger | Accepted click during an Action Capture session | Click, modified click, hotkey, or simple capture |
| Automatic context | Click location and optional parsed step title in current UI | Click marker, cursor, and parsed step-title templates |
| Page editing | Ordered pages, titles, descriptions, organization, Framing, Action Focus, and annotations | Steps, titles, rich descriptions, reorder, hide, duplicate, substeps, crop, effects, and annotations |
| Document export | PDF, PNG, JPG, WebP, and ZIP on Free and Pro | PDF, Word, PowerPoint, HTML, Markdown, JSON, images, animated GIF, and documented integrations |
| Free plan | 5 Action Capture steps per session; all document exports | 5 guides, unlimited steps, all annotations, PDF, 2 templates, and 20 online guides |
| Storage model | Local Mac document and user-chosen export destination | Local capture, editing, and export, with optional hosted and integration routes |
The comparison uses current UI inspection and official documentation. Plan packaging may change, so confirm the current product pages before deciding.
Choose by platform
Shotomatic is a Mac app. Its interface and capture behavior are built around the macOS permission, window, and export workflow.
Folge supports Mac and Windows. The Folge overview documents the same guide model across both platforms, which can reduce tool changes for authors who work on more than one operating system.
Choose Shotomatic when the authoring environment is Mac-only. Choose Folge when Windows authoring is a current requirement rather than a possible future need.
Compare capture control
Shotomatic Action Capture saves the target state immediately before an accepted click and stores the click location. The current Configure panel includes outside-click behavior, parsed step-title templates, cursor display, and marker treatment.
Folge's capture settings include capture on click, modifier-based inclusion or exclusion, hotkey-only capture, screenshot delay, outside clicks, cursor choice, click-area marking, and parsed title templates.
Folge exposes more trigger variations in its documented settings. Shotomatic keeps the main flow centered on starting Action Capture, completing the task, and reviewing the resulting pages.
Compare editing and guide structure
Shotomatic uses an ordered page list with a screenshot, title, description, and Action Focus for each page. Free includes organization, Text, Rectangle, Ellipse, Line, Arrow, Framing, undo, and redo. Pro adds Blur, Click Marker, and Step Numbers.
Folge uses a document editor with a step list, canvas, and properties panel. Its step management documentation includes duplicate, skip, delete, bulk crop, status, move-to-position, drag reordering, and nested substeps. The editor also provides formatted descriptions and text blocks.
Choose the simpler page model when each captured action should become one clear instruction. Choose the richer document model when guides need nested sections, formatted text, status, or several document-level structures before export.
Compare annotation tools
Shotomatic Free provides Text, Rectangle, Ellipse, Line, Arrow, Framing, and Action Focus. Pro adds Blur, Click Marker, and Step Numbers.
Folge's annotation documentation lists rectangles, ovals, lines, arrows, brush, text, tooltips, cursors, step numbers, blur, highlight, magnification, spotlight, OCR, crop, and image assets.
Folge currently documents a broader annotation set. Shotomatic's toolset is narrower and connected to its page-focused editor.
Compare export and delivery
Shotomatic exports PDF, PNG, JPG, WebP, and ZIP on Free and Pro. This set covers image delivery, an ordered document, web-oriented images, and a package of files.
Folge's getting-started guide lists PDF, Word, PowerPoint, HTML, Markdown, JSON, image export, animated GIF, and documented routes to systems such as WordPress, Notion, and Confluence. Export settings include layout and branding options that vary by format.
Choose Shotomatic when images, PDF, or a file package are the expected end state. Choose Folge when office documents, HTML, Markdown, structured data, animated output, or customized export layouts are core requirements.
Compare plan fit without relying on a fixed price
Shotomatic Free supports 5 saved Action Capture steps per session and unlimited saved guides. It saves the fifth step before pausing, then lets the user open the document or activate Pro and continue the same session. Pro removes the session step limit and adds Blur, Click Marker, and Step Numbers. Document export formats are the same on both plans.
Folge's current plan page lists 5 guides, unlimited steps, all annotations, PDF export, 2 templates, and 20 online guides on Free. Check the current page for the format or integration your workflow requires.
Choose Shotomatic or Folge
Choose Shotomatic when you want a focused Mac click-capture workflow, an ordered screenshot document, a usable five-step route on Free, and straightforward file export.
Choose Folge when you need Mac and Windows authoring, several capture triggers, nested guide structure, extensive annotations, or a broad document and integration export set.
The hands-on checks support the workflow and output differences above, but they do not establish which app is faster, easier, or produces better-looking output. See Action Capture and the broader Shotomatic feature set for current product details, then check current plan details. Best Step Recorder for Mac covers the broader category decision.
Related posts
See more postsBest Step Recorder for Mac: Compare Guide-Creation Options
Compare Mac step recorders for click capture, editing, privacy, sharing, and export, including Shotomatic, Folge, Scribe, and built-in tools.

How to Create a Step-by-Step Guide from Clicks on Mac
Create a step-by-step guide on Mac by capturing meaningful clicks, marking each action, editing the steps, and exporting images or a PDF.

Local vs Cloud Process Documentation Tools
Choose a local or cloud process documentation tool based on capture, storage, privacy, collaboration, offline access, sharing, and administration.

How to Annotate Screenshots for Clear Instructions on Mac
Use click markers, arrows, shapes, text, crop, and blur to make instructional screenshots clear without covering important context.

Ready to automate your screenshots?
Archive books, capture content, and save hours of manual work.